1. الشریف، محمدمهدی (1399). منطق حقوق: پژوهشی در منطق حاکم بر تفسیر و استدلال حقوقی. ویرایش دوم، چاپ 5. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
2. امیدی، جلیل (1398). تفسیر قوانین جزایی. چاپ 1، تهران: میزان.
3. انصاری، باقر (1392). نقش قاضی در تحول نظام حقوقی. چاپ 2، تهران: میزان.
4. پورمحمدی، رضا (1402). درآمدی بر تفسیر حقوقی. قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
5. پورمحمدی، رضا، محمدمهدی یوسفی و محمدعبدالصالح شاهنوش فروشانی (1400). «تأثیر پیشینۀ اجتماعی قضات بر آرای قضایی»‏. مطالعات حقوق خصوصی 51 (3): 409-27.
6. پورمحمدی، رضا و محمدمهدی یوسفی (1400). تأثیر جنسیت بر تفسیر حقوقی‏. مجله حقوقی دادگستری، 86 (119)، 99-119.
7. جعفری‌تبار، حسن (1388). فلسفه تفسیری حقوق. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
8. خمینی، سید روح­الله (1389). صحیفه امام. تهران: مؤسسه تنظیم و نشر آثار امام خمینی (ره).
9. سمائی، مهدی، حبیب زاده، محمدجعفر (1401). «قاضی فضیلت‌مند؛ سهم فضیلت‌گرایی در نظریۀ قضاوت»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، 86 (118)، ص 49-74.
10. سمائی، مهدی، حبیب زاده، محمدجعفر، نوبهار، رحیم (1402). «قاضی همچون نگهبانِ حق‌ها؛ جستاری دربارۀ رویکردِ حق‌محور به کنشگریِ قضایی»، مجله حقوقی دادگستری، 87 (122)، ص 159-189.
11. صورت مشروح مذاکرات مجلس بررسی نهایی قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران (۱۳۶۴). تهران: اداره کل امور فرهنگی و روابط عمومی مجلس شورای اسلامی.
12. قیاسی‌، جلال‌الدین (1399)‌. روش‌ تفسیر قوانین‌ کیفری‌. چاپ 2، قم: موسسه بوستان کتاب.
13. کاتوزیان، ناصر (۱۳۹۹). فلسفه حقوق. چاپ 3، تهران: گنج دانش.
14. کاتوزیان، ناصر (1400). حقوق خانواده. چاپ 6، تهران: گنج دانش.
15. محقق داماد، سیدمصطفی، حسینی نسب، سیدمصطفی، پورمحمدی، رضا (1401). اصول فقه تحلیلی؛ دفتر اول: تفسیر فقهی. قم: بوستان کتاب.
16. «تجلیل از ۶ بخش برتر در حوزه حقوق شهروندی»، خبرگزاری ایسنا (10/2/1398). isna.ir/news/98021005623/تجلیل-از-۶-بخش-برتر-در-حوزه-حقوق-شهروندی
17. Ackerman, Bruce. “The New Separation of Powers.” Harvard Law Review 113, no. 3 (2000): 633–729. https://doi.org/‌10.2307/‌1342286.
18. Ake, Claude. “A Definition of Political Stability.” Comparative Politics 7, no. 2 (1975): 271–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/421552.
19. Arner, Douglas W. Financial Stability, Economic Growth, and the Role of Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
20. Barak, Aharon. Purposive Interpretation in Law. Translated by Sari Bashi. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
21. Barber, N. W. “Prelude to the Separation of Powers.” The Cambridge Law Journal 60, no. 1 (March 2001): 59–88. https://doi.org/10.‌1017/‌S0008197301000629.
22. Barendt, Eric. An Introduction To Constitutional Law. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
23. Blackstone, William. Commentaries on the Laws of England: In Four Books. Printed at the Clarendon Press, 1770.
24. Bono, Francesco. The Value of the Stability of the Law: A Perspective on the Role of the Emperor in Political Crises. Brill, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004400474_005.
25. Canon, Bradley C. “Defining the Dimensions of Judicial Activism.” Judicature 66 (1983 1982): 236.
26. Devlin, Patrick, Patrick Baron Devlin, and Patrick Devlin Bar. The Judge. Oxford University Press, 1979.
27. Douglas, William O. “Stare Decisis.” Columbia Law Review 49, no. 6 (1949): 735–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/1119147.
28. Dworkin, Gerald. “Stare Decisis in the House of Lords.” The Modern Law Review 25, no. 2 (1962): 163–78.
29. Eskridge, William. “Textualism, the Unknown Ideal?” Michigan Law Review 96, no. 6 (May 1, 1998): 1509–60.
30. Eskridge, William N. “All about Words: Early Understandings of the ‘Judicial Power’ in Statutory Interpretation, 1776-1806.” Columbia Law Review 101, no. 5 (2001): 990–1106. https://‌doi.org‌/‌10.2307/1123771.
31. Friendly, Henry J. “The Gap in Lawmaking-Judges Who Can’t and Legislators Who Won’t.” Columbia Law Review 63, no. 5 (May 1963): 787. https://doi.org/10.2307/1120530.
32. Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. Rev. ed., 15. print. A Yale Paperbound 152. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1978.
33. Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary. 11th edition. St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters, 2019.
34. Golightly, Cornelius L. “Ethics and Moral Activism.” The Monist 56, no. 4 (1972): 576–86.
35. Gorsuch, Honorable Neil. “Of Lions and Bears, Judges and Legislators, and the Legacy of Justice Scalia.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 66, no. 4 (January 1, 2016): 905.
36. Gwyn, William B. The Meaning of the Separation of Powers: An Analysis of the Doctrine from Its Origin to the Adoption of the United States Constitution. Tulane University, 1965.
37. Hagan, Sean. Law and Financial Stability. Edited by International Monetary Fund. INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, 2020.
38. Harlan, John M. The Evolution of a Judicial Philosophy: Selected Opinions and Papers of Justice John M. Harlan. Harvard University Press, 1969.
39. Hellman, Arthur. “Judicial Activism: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.” Mississippi College Law Review 21 (January 1, 2002): 253.
40. Heydon, Dyson. “Judicial Activism and the Death of the Rule of Law.” Otago Law Review, 2004. https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/journals/OtaLawRw/2004/2.html.
41. Holland, Kenneth M., ed. Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1991.
42. Kmiec, Keenan D. “The Origin and Current Meanings of ‘Judicial Activism.’” California Law Review 92, no. 5 (2004): 1441–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481421.
43. Leonhardt, Hans. “The Nuremberg Trial: A Legal Analysis.” The Review of Politics 11, no. 4 (1949): 449–76.
44. Lile, W. M. “Some Views on the Rule of Stare Decisis.” Virginia Law Review 4, no. 2 (1916): 95–113. https://doi.org/‌10.2307/‌1063617.
45. Marmor, Andrei. Law in the Age of Pluralism. 1st edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.
46. O’Connor, Robert E. “Political Activism and Moral Reasoning: Political and Apolitical Students in Great Britain and France.” British Journal of Political Science 4, no. 1 (1974): 53–78.
47. Popkin, William. “The Collaborative Model of Statutory Interpretation.” 61 Southern California Law Review 541 (1988), January 1, 1988. https://www.repository‌.law.indiana.edu/‌facpub/907.
48. Roosevelt, Kermit. The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions. New Haven, Conn. London: Yale University Press, 2006.
49. Scalia, Antonin, and Bryan A. Garner. Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts. 1st edition. St. Paul, MN: West, 2012.
50. Schmidhauser, John R. “Stare Decisis, Dissent, and the Background of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 14, no. 2 (1962): 194–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/825322.
51. Sempill, Julian. “The Rule of Law and the Rule of Men: History, Legacy, Obscurity.” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 12, no. 3 (December 1, 2020): 511–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-020-00149-9.
52. Semwal, M. M., and Sunil Khosla. “Judicial Activism.” The Indian Journal of Political Science 69, no. 1 (2008): 113–26.
53. Siegel, Jonathan R. “Textualism and Contextualism in Administrative Law.” Boston University Law Review 78 (1998): 1023.
54. Tanguiane, Andranick S. Analytical Theory of Democracy: History, Mathematics and Applications. Studies in Choice and Welfare. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39691-6.
55. Van Alstyne, William. “Clashing Visions of a ‘Living’ Constitution: Of Opportunists and Obligationists.” 2010-2011 Cato Supreme Court Review 13-26 (2011), January 1, 2010. https://scholarship.‌law.wm.edu/facpubs/1620.
56. Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. 2nd ed. edition. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1998.

Whitney, Edward B. “The Doctrine of Stare Decisis.” Michigan Law Review 3, no. 2 (1904): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/1272790.