The main question in this study aims to discuss the essence of somatic interpretation of the concept of Zowjiyyat in both Iranian Islamic civilizations and the contemporary Western civilization. It also aims to explain that how the different understanding considering the issue of the concept of Zowjiyyat in these two civilizations (which is rooted in theoretical and philosophical foundations) has been manifested in housing architecture. The method applied for achieving the mentioned goal is the method of logical reasoning. According to the findings of this research, unlike Iranian Islamic culture, which, based on the principle of justice, considers a different position for each of the elements of Zowjiyyat (including man and woman), in contemporary Western culture affected by the influence of the foundations of contemporary Western philosophy, the concept of dialectical conflict has replaced the concept of Zowjiyyat. Hence, as a result of this dialectical conflict, antithesis occurs, the result of which is equality (and not justice) leading consequently to the loss of women's requirements in contemporary western culture. The somatic interpretation of this concept in housing architecture has resulted in the fact that, unlike Iranian Islamic housing, in which there were external and internal spaces that corresponded to different gender requirements, in contemporary western housing, the internal parts of the house are completely transmuted to the external, and the dialectical conflict between philosophical concepts of  thesis and antithesis has resulted in a synthesis which its somatic interpretation is the elimination of the dignity and position of women in contemporary western housing.